Exploring the Potential of Chemical Inhibitors for Targeting Post-translational Glycosylation of Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)

The Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 expressed on the viral cell surface is of particular importance as it facilitates viral entry into the host cells. The S protein is heavily glycosylated with 22 N-glycosylation sites and a few N-glycosylation sites. During the viral surface protein synthesis via the host ribosomal machinery, glycosylation is an essential step in post-translational modifications (PTMs) and consequently vital for its life cycle, structure, immune evasion, and cell infection. Interestingly, the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and the host receptor protein, ACE2, are also extensively glycosylated and these surface glycans are critical for the viral–host cell interaction for viral entry. The glycosylation pathway of both virus (hijacked from the host biosynthetic machinery) and target cells crucially affect SARS-CoV-2 infection at different levels. For example, the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) of host cells serve as a cofactor as they interact with the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S-glycoprotein and play a protective role in host immune evasion via masking the viral peptide epitopes. Hence, the post-translational glycan biosynthesis, processing, and transport events could be potential targets for developing therapeutic drugs and vaccines. Especially, inhibition of the N-glycan biosynthesis pathway amplifies S protein proteolysis and, thus, blocks viral entry. The chemical inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 glycosylation could be evaluated for Covid-19. In this review, we discuss the current status of the chemical inhibitors (both natural and synthetically designed inhibitors) of viral glycosylation for Covid-19 and provide a future perspective. It could be an important strategy in targeting the various emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs), as these inhibitors are postulated to aid in reducing the viral load as well as infectivity.

Drug Discovery of Small Molecules for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Review on Clinical Studies.

Recently, a sudden outbreak of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was caused by a zoonotic virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). It has caused pandemic situations around the globe affecting the lives of millions of people. So far, no drug has been approved for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. As of now, more than 1000 clinical trials are going on for repurposing of FDA-approved drugs and for evaluating the safety and efficiency of experimental antiviral molecules to combat COVID-19. Since the development of new drugs may require months to years to reach the market, this review focusses on the potential of existing small molecule FDA approved drugs and the molecules already in the clinical pipeline against viral infections like HIV, hepatitis B, Ebola virus, and other viruses of coronavirus family (SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV). The review also discusses the natural products and traditional medicines in clinical studies against COVID-19. Currently, 1978 studies are active, 143 completed and 4 posted results (as of June 13, 2020) on clinicaltrials.gov.

Virtual screening and molecular simulation study of natural products database for lead identification of novel coronavirus main protease inhibitors.

3CL like protease (3CLpro or Mpro) is one of the main proteases of 2019-nCoV. The 3CLpro is a nonstructural protein of SARS-CoV and has an essential role in viral replication and transcription, thus, could be a potential target for anti-SARS drug development. The present study employed ligand- and structure-based approaches to identify the potent inhibitors of 2019-nCoV protease. The e-pharmacophore developed from 3CLpro-1 yielded virtual hits, that were subjected through drug likeliness and PAINS filters to remove interfering compounds. Further comprehensive docking studies, free energy calculations and ADMET studies resulted in two virtual leads- MolPort-000-410-348 and MolPort-002-530-156. The compounds MolPort-000-410-348 and MolPort-002-530-156 displayed good docking score of -12.09 and -13.38 Kcal/mol and free binding energy of -63.34 ± 2.03 and -61.52 ± 2.24 Kcal/mol, respectively. The compounds also exhibited satisfactory predicted ADMET profile and were subjected to molecular dynamic (MD) studies. The MD simulation produced stable complexes of these ligands with 3CLpro protein and ligand RMSD in acceptable limits. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.